Skip to main content

Table 3 Relations between maternal rural-to-urban migrant status and EBF stratified by different sociodemographic characteristics

From: What is the impact of rural-to-urban migration on exclusive breastfeeding: a population-based cross-sectional study

 

N (%)

p-value

Adjusted OR (95% CI) a

Local

Migrant

Local

Migrant

Education b

 High

406 (35.37)

224 (34.51)

0.716

1.00 (reference)

0.79 (0.63, 0.98)

 Mid

109 (25.17)

53 (23.87)

0.715

1.00 (reference)

0.75 (0.50, 1.14)

 Low

172 (25.11)

84 (22.34)

0.314

1.00 (reference)

0.86 (0.63, 1.16)

Residence

 Metropolis

378 (37.95)

276 (33.50)

0.049

1.00 (reference)

0.81 (0.66, 0.99)

 Medium sized/small cites

310 (24.35)

85 (20.09)

0.073

1.00 (reference)

0.77 (0.58, 1.02)

Ethnicity

 Han

565 (29.72)

302 (30.57)

0.999

1.00 (reference)

0.86 (0.71, 1.03)

 Minority

123 (33.70)

59 (22.87)

0.010

1.00 (reference)

0.60 (0.41, 0.87)

  1. aThe adjusted variables are the same variables adjusted in the Model C, Table 2
  2. b1 case with missing data of maternal education level