Skip to main content

Table 3 Relations between maternal rural-to-urban migrant status and EBF stratified by different sociodemographic characteristics

From: What is the impact of rural-to-urban migration on exclusive breastfeeding: a population-based cross-sectional study

  N (%) p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) a
Local Migrant Local Migrant
Education b
 High 406 (35.37) 224 (34.51) 0.716 1.00 (reference) 0.79 (0.63, 0.98)
 Mid 109 (25.17) 53 (23.87) 0.715 1.00 (reference) 0.75 (0.50, 1.14)
 Low 172 (25.11) 84 (22.34) 0.314 1.00 (reference) 0.86 (0.63, 1.16)
Residence
 Metropolis 378 (37.95) 276 (33.50) 0.049 1.00 (reference) 0.81 (0.66, 0.99)
 Medium sized/small cites 310 (24.35) 85 (20.09) 0.073 1.00 (reference) 0.77 (0.58, 1.02)
Ethnicity
 Han 565 (29.72) 302 (30.57) 0.999 1.00 (reference) 0.86 (0.71, 1.03)
 Minority 123 (33.70) 59 (22.87) 0.010 1.00 (reference) 0.60 (0.41, 0.87)
  1. aThe adjusted variables are the same variables adjusted in the Model C, Table 2
  2. b1 case with missing data of maternal education level